The Big Question When governments invest in their people through education, healthcare and social services, does it help grow the economy? Or are these “soft” investments less important than building physical infrastructure and industry? This study looks at evidence from Indian states to find surprising answers.
Key Findings At a Glance:
- Government spending on people (especially education) significantly boosts economic growth
- Health spending improves lives but doesn’t directly affect growth
- Education spending shows strongest link to both human development and economic gains
- Physical infrastructure spending had less impact than expected
The Human Development Story: A Tale of Three States
The Leaders:
- Kerala: Highest human development, strong social spending
- Maharashtra: High growth, balanced spending
- Punjab: Strong performance on both metrics
The Laggards:
- Bihar: Lowest human development, low social spending
- BIMARU states (Bihar, MP, Rajasthan, UP): Chronic underinvestment
- Orissa: Poor outcomes despite moderate spending
The Investment Patterns
1. Overall Government Spending (1980-97)
- Highest: Jammu & Kashmir (59.5% of state income)
- Lowest: Maharashtra (18.6%)
- Trend: Most states increased spending in 1990s
2. Development vs Administrative Spending
- Development spending: 51-68% of total
- Ten states cut development spending in 1990s
- Social services got squeezed most
3. Focus Areas Within Social Spending
- Education: ~70% of social spending
- Healthcare: Varied widely by state
- Concerning trend: Core social spending declined in 1990s
The Growth Impact Story
What Drives Growth?
- Education spending shows strongest positive impact
- Overall social spending boosts growth significantly
- Infrastructure spending impact was surprisingly weak
- Health spending helps development but not direct growth
The Education Edge
- Every 1% increase in education spending linked to measurable GDP gains
- Impact strongest in states with consistent education investment
- Multiplier effect through improved workforce skills
Policy Implications: The Way Forward
For Policymakers:
- Prioritize education spending even in tight times
- Maintain health investments for development
- Balance social and physical infrastructure
- Focus on implementation quality
For Development Practitioners:
- Track spending-outcome links
- Build evidence for social investment
- Support state capacity building
- Promote balanced development approaches
The Bigger Picture
The evidence suggests that investing in people isn’t just good social policy – it’s smart economics. States that maintained strong social sector spending, especially in education, saw better growth outcomes. The key is consistency and quality of investment, not just quantity.
Looking Ahead The findings raise important questions for India’s development path:
- How to maintain social spending during fiscal stress?
- What’s the right balance between different types of public investment?
- How to improve spending effectiveness?
- Can human development investment help reduce regional inequalities?
Academic Abstract:
For explaining growth differentials across the countries, recent growth literature is increasingly relying on the process of human capital accumulation along with the traditional factors like labour and non-human capital. This study has investigated the role of human development policy on the economic growth of Indian states for the period 1980-97. Evidences suggest that the human development position of the states is strongly determined by the human development policy pursued. Panel data evidence investigating the growth impact of human development policy found that economic growth significantly depends upon the human development policy It confirmed that the government allocation for education is critical for eco nomic development. However, per capita health expenditure does not posses any significant growth impact.
Learn More:
Full citation: Pradhan, Jaya Prakash and V. Abraham (2002), ‘Does Human Development Policy Matter for Economic Growth? Evidence from Indian States’, South Asia Economic Journal, 3(1), pp. 77–93, Publisher: SAGE Publications.
Learn More:
