Export Dynamics at the Firm & Regional Levels

High-Tech Exports & Indian Industry: A Tale of Transformation and Challenge

By Jaya Prakash Pradhan December 6, 2007 701

Print Article

Type	Book chapter
Title	“Knowledge-based Exports from India: Recent Trends, Patterns, and Implications”
Authors	Nagesh Kumar & Jaya Prakash Pradhan
In	N. Kumar & K. J. Joseph (eds.), International Competitiveness & Knowledge-based Industries, pp. 21–52 · Oxford University Press, 2007
Read	Chapter (PDF)

This is a plain-language summary of “Knowledge-based Exports from India: Recent Trends, Patterns, and Implications” (Kumar & Pradhan, in International Competitiveness & Knowledge-based Industries, 2007).

In short:

Asking whether India could compete in knowledge-intensive, high-tech exports, the chapter finds India’s export structure still dominated by low-technology products — the climb up the technology ladder had barely happened.
The 1991 reforms did improve firm-level export performance across technology segments — but mainly for domestic firms.
A standout result: Indian firms with affiliates abroad (i.e. firms that had themselves invested overseas) were stronger exporters than firms without such a global presence.

The question

High-technology industries — pharmaceuticals, electronics, and the like — grow faster, add more value, and throw off more knowledge spillovers than traditional manufacturing, which is why competing in them matters so much for a developing economy. This chapter by Nagesh Kumar and Jaya Prakash Pradhan asks whether India managed to break into high-tech exports during the reform-era 1990s — and reaches a candid, mixed verdict.

The starting point: a low-tech export base

The chapter’s framing fact is the shape of India’s export structure, which it shows changed remarkably little.

India’s manufacturing exports sat overwhelmingly at the low-tech base — on the order of 60% in low-technology goods like textiles and food products — with roughly 35% in medium-tech (chemicals, machinery) and only about 5% in high-tech (pharmaceuticals, electronics). The striking point is not just the shape but its persistence: this structure barely shifted across the period studied, underscoring how hard it is to move up the technology ladder. For global context, the chapter notes that high-tech trade was growing far faster than world trade overall, that developed countries dominated high-tech exports, that East Asia led the developing world, and that India’s share of developing-country high-tech exports remained under 1%.

What the reforms changed — and for whom

The analytical core is the chapter’s assessment of how the 1991 reforms affected firms’ export performance, and the answer is pointedly uneven.

Three findings stand out. First, reforms did improve enterprise-level export performance across technology segments — the opening-up helped firms sell abroad. Second, that improvement was mainly concentrated among domestic firms — which, as the chapter notes, complicates the assumption that foreign-owned firms are automatically the stronger exporters. Third — and this is the result most worth getting right — Indian firms with a foreign presence through affiliates established abroad were superior exporters to firms without such overseas investment, showing a higher export intensity (around 12% versus 8%). The important clarification: this “global presence” advantage refers to Indian firms that had themselves invested overseas (outward FDI), not to foreign multinationals operating in India. Firms that had built their own international operations understood foreign markets better, could provide after-sales service, and exported more as a result.

Why it matters

The chapter’s honest bottom line is that India’s move into high-tech exports was, as of the 2000s, still a work in progress. Reforms helped, and home-grown firms — especially those expanding internationally — drove much of the gain; but the export base remained stubbornly low-tech, and genuine technology upgrading lagged behind hopes. The implications it draws are constructive: build firms’ technological capabilities directly rather than assuming reforms alone will do it; encourage Indian firms to establish international operations, since that global presence demonstrably helped exports; and design targeted policy for high-tech sectors rather than relying on across-the-board liberalisation. It’s a useful corrective to any triumphant “reforms fixed everything” narrative — the gains were real but partial, and concentrated in specific kinds of firms.

About this chapter

Higher export competitiveness in high-technology industries has become a focus of policy attention in both developed and developing countries, since these industries are higher value-adding, faster-growing segments of manufacturing that can generate significant knowledge spillovers vital for growth. This chapter finds that India’s export structure continues to be dominated by low-technology products. Economic reforms helped improve enterprise-level export performance across technology segments; however, in the post-reform period this improvement was mainly limited to domestic firms. Indian firms with a foreign presence — through affiliates established abroad — showed superior export performance compared with firms not having such overseas investment. The chapter appears in N. Kumar and K. J. Joseph (eds.), International Competitiveness and Knowledge-based Industries (Oxford University Press, 2007).

Cite this chapter

Kumar, N., & Pradhan, J. P. (2007). Knowledge-based exports from India: Recent trends, patterns, and implications. In N. Kumar & K. J. Joseph (Eds.), International Competitiveness & Knowledge-based Industries (pp. 21–52). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Read the chapter (PDF) →