Beyond Family Ties: How Business Group Affiliation Shapes Global Expansion

By Jaya Prakash Pradhan December 5, 2011 938

Print Article

Type	Journal article (empirical study)
Title	“Business Group Affiliation and Location of Indian Firms’ Foreign Acquisitions”
Authors	Jaya Prakash Pradhan & Neelam Singh
Published	2011 · Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2(1), pp. 19–41 · World Scientific
Data	800+ foreign acquisitions by Indian firms · 2000–2008
Read	DOI: 10.1142/S1793993311000208

This is a plain-language summary of “Business Group Affiliation and Location of Indian Firms’ Foreign Acquisitions” (Pradhan & Singh, Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2011).

In short:

When Indian firms buy companies abroad, where they go depends heavily on whether they belong to a business group or stand alone.
Group-affiliated firms cast a wider, bolder net — 62 countries, a tilt toward Europe, and comfort with distant, unfamiliar markets. Standalone firms stayed closer and more cautious — 45 countries, concentrated in North America.
The difference traces to the resources and networks a business group provides.

Same goal, two strategies

Between 2000 and 2008, Indian firms made more than 800 foreign acquisitions. This study — drawing on that full set of deals — asks whether a firm’s organisational form changes where it chooses to buy. It does, markedly.

Business-group-affiliated firms behaved like confident global players. They acquired across 62 countries, leaned toward Europe (55% of their deals), and were comfortable buying in distant, unfamiliar markets — cultural proximity barely affected their choices. They were drawn to host markets with strong growth and bilateral investment treaties, and several targeted fuel resources.

Standalone firms were more conservative. They reached 45 countries, concentrated nearly half their deals in North America, and preferred culturally and commercially familiar destinations — places India already traded heavily with. Their choices were shaped more by tax treaties, and several targeted ore and steel resources.

Why the difference: the power of networks

The gap isn’t about ambition; it’s about capability. Belonging to a business group gives a firm a set of advantages that make bolder, more distant acquisitions feasible: access to group-wide resources and expertise, established international networks, stronger negotiating power, better risk management, and the reputation of the group behind any deal. Those “derived resources” let group affiliates venture where a standalone firm, however willing, would find the risks harder to absorb. A standalone firm, by contrast, leans on the familiar — markets it already exports to, and the institutional comfort of tax treaties — to manage that same risk.

What it means

The practical takeaway is that one size doesn’t fit all. A group-affiliated firm can use its parent network to expand boldly into high-growth, distant markets; a standalone firm is usually better served by focusing on destinations with strong institutional frameworks and existing trade ties. For policymakers, the study suggests tailoring tools to firm type — bilateral investment treaties matter more for group-led expansion, tax treaties more for standalone firms — and giving standalone firms extra support if the goal is to broaden who participates in India’s outward investment.

Read the academic abstract

This study examines the determinants of the host location of cross-border acquisitions by Indian business-group (BG) affiliates and other firms during 2000–2008. The empirical estimates indicate the general attraction of host-country market size and double-taxation-avoidance treaties. However, unlike standalone firms, the acquisition location of BG affiliates is favourably influenced by the host growth rate and bilateral investment treaties; they appear drawn to distant nations and are not significantly affected by cultural proximity. The host’s share of home exports affects the acquisition location of standalone firms relatively more. Thus, the derived resources and parental networks of BG-affiliated emerging-market multinationals shape their outward-FDI locational pattern.

Cite this article

Pradhan, J. P., & Singh, N. (2011). Business group affiliation and location of Indian firms’ foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793993311000208

Read the article (DOI) →